Can we have the Marauder pls? (e.g. included in a new IS Package)

Thread in 'MechWarrior Online' started by Blagg Zear, Sep 29, 2014.

What do you want?

  1. Original Marauder (unchanged, simply Original pls!)

    6 vote(s)
    20.0%
  2. PGI can redesign, but Name must be Original

    21 vote(s)
    70.0%
  3. PGI can redesign & use another Name

    3 vote(s)
    10.0%
  4. other (namely?)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Blagg Zear

    Blagg Zear Star Lord

    5,001
    578
    199
    Unseen lawsuit: http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Unseen

    If PGI has any lawsuit problems with bringing alive the Marauder, why not just make a MWO Version with a different name and a redesign, which only resembles the original design in the spirit?

    e.g. this here:
    [​IMG]
    [img width=700 height=888]http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/089/d/a/battletech___grey_death_marauder_by_shimmering_sword-d4ugbiu.jpg[/img]
    [img width=700 height=466]http://th05.deviantart.net/fs71/PRE/f/2012/171/8/2/highlander_marauder_by_shimmering_sword-d548k5f.jpg[/img]

    it's not 1:1 with the original design:
    [img width=617 height=478]http://anymoon.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/Officer%20Pod%20Box.jpg[/img]

    So should not be a lawsuit problem, right? Ok, the Name is another thing PGI has to solve, right?

    Maybe call it the Mad Crab and use the design of the King Crab to create something similar:
    [img width=700 height=598]http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/dd195/cronic0_0/King_Crab.jpg[/img]

    Or call it the Scavenger, whatever...
    [img width=700 height=441]http://bg.battletech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BattleMech-Tech-Page-illustration.jpg[/img]
    [img width=700 height=525]http://i.imgur.com/JR9goGn.jpg[/img]
    [img width=700 height=840]http://i.imgur.com/0jcJfXE.jpg[/img]
    [img width=700 height=623]http://i.imgur.com/OyQllTG.jpg[/img]
    [img width=700 height=908]http://i1280.photobucket.com/albums/a485/bishopsteiner/2244e078-0006-4e2c-85f4-1d02ffe9a989_zps1068e1eb.jpg[/img]
    [img width=700 height=636]http://memberfiles.freewebs.com/24/48/79504824/photos/undefined/XXX%20MAX2.png[/img]

    C'mon, we really want that Mech!


    Interesting Marauder Redesign Contest: http://mwomercs.com/forums/topic/142485-marauder-contest-all-entry-voting-closed/
    http://mwomercs.com/forums/topic/140210-marauder-concept-design-contest-unofficial-ended/
     
  2. Michael

    Michael Grand Poobah

    4,835
    829
    234
    I am a HUGE proponent of this. I honestly think PGI saying "We aren't going to do any of the Unseen" was Russ and Bryan wussing out. Perhaps they were worried that a bad redesign would be the proverbial Straw but in my opinion, assuming it looked even half as cool as the original, this is something that would bring me back in force.

    I think FD did a black and white marker sketch one day a few years ago. That shit was sick!!!! But noooooooooooooooooo "It may still be too close. We don't want to get in any shit".
     
  3. Regina Redshift

    Regina Redshift Sass Elemental

    1,293
    55
    143
    Harmony Gold defends their Macross license extremely aggressively. If MW:O releases a Marauder, they will get sued. That's the sad reality of IP litigation. Then again we did get the Locust, so maybe there's an arrangement worked out.
     
  4. Chewtoy

    Chewtoy New Member

    8
    0
    2
    Indeed. They already tried to kill the trailer for MW5/MWO because of the Warhammer in it, so they're actively defending it even now.

    Using the name and keeping the spirit could be possible, but I would expect Harmony Gold to at least try and step on PGI regardless over it. If they do, and PGI lose.......

    [quote author=Archwright link=topic=8107.msg54870#msg54870 date=1412053148]
    Then again we did get the Locust, so maybe there's an arrangement worked out.
    [/quote]

    Locust was from a different IP. AFAIK, only the IIC variants for the Macross IP made it in amongst the Reseen (and then only after being redesigned to avoid the problematic lawsuits).

    The rest are all Dougram or Crusher Joe mechs.
     
  5. epikt

    epikt Benefactor

    2,511
    502
    104
    Indeed, the Locust is a Crusher Joe design. And none of the unseen released in MWO was from Macross.
    If I remember correctly what Russ said during the town hall, they could release some Macross mechs but in this case would have to be based not on the "original" designs but on the redesigns (IIC). And they are quite reluctant about that (I agree, I don't want a 85t Marauder).
     
  6. Remarius

    Remarius Star Lord

    3,374
    546
    192
    Well doesn't quite have the allure of the IS 75t version but.... ;)
     
  7. Aylek

    Aylek Administrator Staff Member

    2,761
    528
    197
    Most iconic mech out there... MW:O can never be complete without trying to implement one. I'd love to have the original design, but ultimately would befine with the reseen one or something similar.
     
  8. Dr. Danger

    Dr. Danger Advanced Member

    262
    7
    20
    I don't think the problem is the name Marauder, but the design that was taken from Macross.
     
  9. Michael

    Michael Grand Poobah

    4,835
    829
    234
    This is exactly the case gentlemen. The name Marauder is fine. It is the image that they are protecting.

    HG can go fuck themselves till they are blue in the face.

    The funny thing is, until recently, HG was essentially squatting on their IPs, not really doing anything with them. I think Russ and Bryan need to grow a pair and have these machines redesigned. They did it with the other mechs and, while they aren't all perfect, they are decent enough jobs to get it done.
     
  10. Blagg Zear

    Blagg Zear Star Lord

    5,001
    578
    199
    Found this interesting Article about this issue:

    Source: http://www.qqmercs.com/?p=2859
     
  11. skidog2k3

    skidog2k3 Dispossessed

    I think PGI could keep the spirit of the mech without infringing on HG's IP. Call it a Marauder and you can be sure that HG will be looking closely... as they would with Warhammer, Rifleman, Longbow.....
    Silly thing is regardless of how much it is redesigned HG can still file suit, and regardless of weather it wins or not, it will still cost PGI money defending, which may be the source of the fear. Legal battles without big guns can destroy companies.

    Nice to see you guys again.... nice to be back.
     
  12. skidog2k3

    skidog2k3 Dispossessed

    [member=2826]Blagg Zear[/member]

    Good article Blagg
     
  13. Blagg Zear

    Blagg Zear Star Lord

    5,001
    578
    199
    Exactly what i have thought. Name should not be problem, but HG could stil go on court and try to destroy PGI. :(

    Dito! :)
     
  14. enileph

    enileph Star Lord

    4,203
    518
    201
    Yes, fucking harmony fucking gold is a bitch when it comes to that. (yes, if you are HG people and reading this, fuck you)
    That having said, they have no right to the name marauder or the stats, only the look/design of it.

    So technically it can fly. Another way is to go for the non old Macross version, like those closer to the newer macross, which HG holds no rights too, and the japanese do not care about similar mech things as far as HG, since that type of design is common in anime now.
     
  15. Magnificent Bastard

    Magnificent Bastard Dispossessed

    New IS package? What? Please no. I'd like to see MWO go at least a full year between mech packages and one was just announced. Ideally I'd like to see all of the current proposed mechs make it into the game (for c-bills) and several more before PGI even thinks about announcing another mech pack.

    As for Marauder... sure. It would be nice. Hardly necessary but nice.
     
  16. The Verge

    The Verge Moderator Staff Member

    4,367
    498
    231
    If they were to rename the mech, just rename it to the Marder, after the series of Tank Destroyers Germany developed and deployed in WWII.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marder_I
    [​IMG]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marder_II
    [img width=700 height=422]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bf/Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-197-1238-16%2C_Russland-Mitte%2C_Panzerj%C3%A4ger_%22Marder_II%22.jpg[/img]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marder_III
    [img width=700 height=543]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Marder_III_tank_destroyer.jpg[/img]

    you can really see the similarities in the mech design compared to the TD.
     
  17. TheDevilsIncarnate

    TheDevilsIncarnate Advanced Member

    338
    0
    22
    First off, god no please, my wallet is still recovering from clans.

    Secondly, never going to happen. HG will rip their dicks off if they try or even mention it.
     
  18. Michael

    Michael Grand Poobah

    4,835
    829
    234
    As I said. PGI doesn't have the stones. Right now they are letting everyone else dictate their business plan. It is what it is.
     
  19. RA2lover

    RA2lover Active Member

    88
    0
    12
    i wouldn't rename them - the name is legally owned, and the battletech universe has the "hetzer" as a ground vehicle already.
     
  20. DogSoldieR

    DogSoldieR Active Member

    79
    3
    9
    I whole heartedly support this! MARAUDER MARAUDER MARAUDER!

    :wub:^_^^_^

    Nice write up Blagg!
     
top-fast
top-fast
top-fast
top-fast