Already tried that shortly after the Civil War update and ended up with this: [MEDIA] A tad bit slower, but more ammo and armor and increased range...
With the Ghost Heat treshold increased I removed 1 DHS and added both 1 cuPL (7th) and 0.5t of MG ammo yesterday. Heat Efficiency dropped to 1.44...
Classic build profiting massively from a Light Engine. Also, use the left side for shielding. [MEDIA]
Thanks for the hint! I am using this to catch up on a few chassis, namely Hellfire (Void) + Black Lanner (Bellonarus & -D) and a couple of Mech Bays.
[MEDIA] A tad bit slower, but keeping the 6's with Artemis. Also, a little bit short on armor, but this might work anyway. Needs at least 2x missile...
Also: So my 1151 from February 2018 still marks the high score? :D
Still nearly the only mech I am looking forward to when I return to this game.
I don't care... it's a shame for sure, but as long as you keep away from preordering, it doesn't affect you at all. ;-)
I fail to see why you want to use such an old-school build over a modern version for this play style: [MEDIA]
You can switch to 2x ERML (shoulder mounted) for some limited poking capacities. Beware of the heat in a brawl, though. And yes, the cSPL nerfs was...
Very first idea from the title alone: replace the CT LPL with a Sub Nose PPC and Groupe ist with the AC20.
Looks as if I should patch my client.
I thought this was played with a light engine nowadays? [MEDIA]
Any new / changed verdict now that the Piranha is out for CBills since quite some time?
Haven't played a match since nearly a month but am in touch with my unit. Sounds as if I didn't miss anything at all... might take a look at my PIRs...
[MEDIA] On my quest for more distinguishable and viable builds on the -5 this idea crossed my mind. As I already stated in another thread, 3x ERML...
Nope, because I fully expect PGI to ignore any relevant feedback again - as with mostly any prior PTS as well.
[MEDIA] A simple, but certainly effective update to my trusted and proven older version. While lacking a bit in range, the HMLs provide additional...
The next step would be to exchange the MLas with ERMLas. You even might want to consider getting an ERMLas instead of the regular one from the...
a570307cc00dfd845baefcfcfff6f70ecff7f000000000010000080000000
Sure. Will do during the weekend.
TB Omnimechs suck in comparison to the customization a Battlemech allows in MWO. In addition to this, most of the IS Omnis are coming with SHS stock,...
Why not both? [MEDIA]
Both builds are looking both interesting and hot as f*ck. This is probably because you're using UACs here... what about changing those to LB10s?
Simple reasons for exactly the 6 / 6 setup: from my experience with this chassis I wanted both every single bit of armor, even on the arms (which...
I like it on paper.
[MEDIA] Wow, I struggled quite a bit to finde a build on the -5 which wasn't disappointing firepower-wise. Mounting dual Heavy Gauss was the obvious...
Wow, didn't think of HGRs here yet. Went with 3x LB10 from day 1 in als never looked back. But this looks... great!
This for me. I already started to dislike my BAS quite a bit.
Both & situationally. The other way round works as well if you want that tad bit of extra damage when out of the HMLs optimal range, but still close...
Separate names with a comma.